Trends in Waikato River water quality

Water quality in the Waikato River is much better than it was in the 1950s. Urban and industrial wastewater treatment has improved considerably. But over the past twenty years, levels of nitrogen in the river have risen, probably as a result of land use changes over recent decades.

Pollution of the past

The Waikato River's water quality has improved a great deal. The country's longest river was, 60 years ago, one of the dirtiest. Today, while not pristine, it's much cleaner than in the 1950s and 60s. A description from the Pollution Advisory Council in 1956 sums up the way the river was once used:

"the daily flow of sewage effluent and trade wastes from Hamilton City is three million gallons… in effect, partly digested sludge and raw sewage is being disposed of into the Waikato River".

Water quality records from upstream of Hamilton city, dating back to 1949, show that levels of sewage-related contaminants have stayed roughly the same. However, as the city grew, measurements taken downstream of Hamilton city reveal contaminants increased tenfold between the 1950s and the early 1970s.

In those days, Hamilton's wastewater was discharged to the river, after holding in 14 large septic tanks. The tanks themselves were also emptied into the river up to three times each year. The river also took sewage from other towns, along with effluent from the Horotiu freezing works, Kinleith paper mill, power projects and dairy farms.

The road to recovery

Improvements to urban waste water treatment

Since the 1970s, considerable work has been done to improve the quality of effluent from industrial and urban sources. The 1970s saw major improvements to urban wastewater treatment. The longest water quality record for the Waikato River (at Mercer) shows that this was when river water quality began to improve.

The high levels of contaminants evident in the early 1970s fell to levels ten times lower during the late 1970s and early 1980s.

Recent changes in water quality

Limited monthly monitoring of water quality in the Waikato River began in 1980, with a more comprehensive programme beginning in 1987. We now sample at 10 sites along its length. See a map of our monitoring sites. Analysis of these records indicates how water quality has changed.

Table 1 shows the changes in several water quality measures over the years between 1991 and 2020. Overall, 19 per cent of water quality measures improved at individual sites, and 13 per cent deteriorated.

The records of temperature and dissolved oxygen have shown small changes.

Trends show general improvements in arsenic and in chlorophyll a but E. coli has shown some deterioration

Levels of total nitrogen increased at most sites along the river, probably as a result of land use changes over recent decades. The overall rate of increase over the 30-year period considered is about 1-2 per cent per year. Pressures from wastewaters have generally decreased over recent years, but agricultural land use has continued to intensify.

As the region continues to grow and develop, putting pressure on the river's catchment, careful management is needed to maintain and improve the quality of the Waikato River.

Table 1: Water quality trends in the Waikato River between 1993 and 2022 (based on methods from Waikato Regional Council's Technical Report 2018/30.)

Table legend
	Important improvement
	Slight improvement
u	Uncertain
	Slight deterioration
	Important deterioration

	Taupō Gates	Ohaaki	Ohakuri	Whakamaru	Waipapa	Narrows	Horotiu	Huntly	Mercer
Temperature				u	u		u	u
Dissolved oxygen	u		u
Visual clarity	nd			u	u			u	nd
Turbidity			u	u	u			u
Arsenic
Ammonia	u				u				u
Total nitrogen	u
Dissolved Phosphorus (DRP)				u		u	u
Chlorophyll a	u	u	u	u
E. coli		u	u		u	u	u	u

nd, no data
Flow-adjusted data, n < 360
LOWESS span 30%
Seasonal Kendall slope
Slope probability > 95%

Note: visual clarity, turbidity and arsenic are for the period since 1995, and E. coli is for the period since 1998.

Footnote to trends chart

• ‘Uncertain’ means that any overall change in average values is likely just to be due to chance (at the 5 per cent level).
• Where a trend is identified, any overall change is unlikely to be due to chance (at the 5 per cent level).
• A slight trend has a rate of change which is less than 1 per cent of the median value per year.
• An important trend has a rate of change which is more than 1 per cent of the median value per year. 

Find out more about water quality for swimming in the Waikato River.

What can you do to help protect the Waikato River?

• Don’t tip hazardous substances (such as paint washings or used oil) into stormwater drains.
• Adopt careful land management practices to minimise contaminated run off from your property. Check out our information for farmers.
• Fence riverbanks to keep stock out and prevent stock damage.
• Work with the Waikato Regional Council to obtain a resource consent if you want to discharge wastewater to the river. Check out our rules and policies for discharges, In our Regional Plan.
• Don’t waste water – use it more efficiently and effectively.